rxrpc: Fix call removal to use RCU safe deletion

Fix rxrpc call removal from the rxnet->calls list to use list_del_rcu()
rather than list_del_init() to prevent stuffing up reading
/proc/net/rxrpc/calls from potentially getting into an infinite loop.

This, however, means that list_empty() no longer works on an entry that's
been deleted from the list, making it harder to detect prior deletion.  Fix
this by:

Firstly, make rxrpc_destroy_all_calls() only dump the first ten calls that
are unexpectedly still on the list.  Limiting the number of steps means
there's no need to call cond_resched() or to remove calls from the list
here, thereby eliminating the need for rxrpc_put_call() to check for that.

rxrpc_put_call() can then be fixed to unconditionally delete the call from
the list as it is the only place that the deletion occurs.

Fixes: 2baec2c3f8 ("rxrpc: Support network namespacing")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319150150.4189381-1-dhowells%40redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260408121252.2249051-5-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
master
David Howells 2026-04-08 13:12:32 +01:00 committed by Jakub Kicinski
parent 6a59d84b4f
commit 146d4ab94c
2 changed files with 10 additions and 16 deletions

View File

@ -347,7 +347,7 @@
EM(rxrpc_call_see_release, "SEE release ") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_userid_exists, "SEE u-exists") \
EM(rxrpc_call_see_waiting_call, "SEE q-conn ") \
E_(rxrpc_call_see_zap, "SEE zap ")
E_(rxrpc_call_see_still_live, "SEE !still-l")
#define rxrpc_txqueue_traces \
EM(rxrpc_txqueue_await_reply, "AWR") \

View File

@ -654,11 +654,9 @@ void rxrpc_put_call(struct rxrpc_call *call, enum rxrpc_call_trace why)
if (dead) {
ASSERTCMP(__rxrpc_call_state(call), ==, RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE);
if (!list_empty(&call->link)) {
spin_lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
list_del_init(&call->link);
spin_unlock(&rxnet->call_lock);
}
spin_lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
list_del_rcu(&call->link);
spin_unlock(&rxnet->call_lock);
rxrpc_cleanup_call(call);
}
@ -730,24 +728,20 @@ void rxrpc_destroy_all_calls(struct rxrpc_net *rxnet)
_enter("");
if (!list_empty(&rxnet->calls)) {
int shown = 0;
spin_lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
while (!list_empty(&rxnet->calls)) {
call = list_entry(rxnet->calls.next,
struct rxrpc_call, link);
_debug("Zapping call %p", call);
rxrpc_see_call(call, rxrpc_call_see_zap);
list_del_init(&call->link);
list_for_each_entry(call, &rxnet->calls, link) {
rxrpc_see_call(call, rxrpc_call_see_still_live);
pr_err("Call %p still in use (%d,%s,%lx,%lx)!\n",
call, refcount_read(&call->ref),
rxrpc_call_states[__rxrpc_call_state(call)],
call->flags, call->events);
spin_unlock(&rxnet->call_lock);
cond_resched();
spin_lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
if (++shown >= 10)
break;
}
spin_unlock(&rxnet->call_lock);