Currently return value of drm_dpcd_readb is not checked when reading sink
Panel Replay Selective Update capabilities.
Fix this and switch to drm_dpcd_read_byte.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250827060809.2461725-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
We are currently observing crc failures after we started using dsb for PSR
updates as well. This seems to happen because PSR HW is still sending
couple of updates using old framebuffers on wake-up.
This patch is preparing to fix that by adding interface which can be used
to add poll ensuring PSR HW is idle into dsb commit.
v3: add intel_dsb as a parameter to intel_psr_wait_for_idle_dsb
v2: add pass crtc_state->dsb_commit as parameter
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250905072708.2659411-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com
PSR work is using __psr_wait_for_idle_locked to ensure PSR exit is
completed before continuing to PSR activation. __psr_wait_for_idle_locked
is unlocking PSR mutex which allows PSR disable/enable and PSR
pause/resume while PSR idle is being wait. PSR enable status is already
checked after locking again PSR mutex but PSR pause counter check is
missing. Due to this PSR work may continue to PSR activation even PSR is
paused.
Fix this by checking PSR pause counter in __psr_wait_for_idle_locked after
PSR mutex is locked again.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250826074457.1992524-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
We are currently removing underrun on idle PSR WA even if it's not
applied. Fix this by checking pkg_c_latency_used on PSR exit as well.
Fixes: 9b1795e9b0 ("drm/i915/psr: Underrun on idle PSR wa only when pkgc latency > delayed vblank")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250822105846.1023631-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently we are ignoriong drm_dp_dpcd_read return values when reading PSR
and Panel Replay capability DPCD register. Rework intel_psr_dpcd a bit to
take care of checking the return value.
v2: use drm_dp_dpcd_read_data
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250821045918.17757-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently intel_psr_work is continuing to activation of PSR which was just
disabled when irq_aux_error == true.
Fix this by skipping everything else than intel_psr_handle_irq in
intel_psr_work when irq_aux_error == true.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250815084534.1637030-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Underrun on idle PSR workaround (Wa_16025596647) is supposed to be
applied only when pkg c latency > delayed vblank. Currently we are
applying it always when other criterias are met.
Fix this by adding new boolean flag which is supposed to be set when
calculating watermark levels and pkgc latency > delayed vblank is
detected. currently this scenario is blocked but might be added
later. Due to this add also TODO comment into
skl_max_wm_level_for_vblank.
Bspec: 74151
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250519075223.443266-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
We want to get rid of triggering "Frame Change" events from
frontbuffer flush calls. We are about to move using TRANS_PUSH
register for this on LunarLake and onwards. Touching TRANS_PUSH
register from fronbuffer flush would be problematic as it's written by
DSB as well.
Fix this by using intel_psr_exit when flush or invalidate is done on
LunarLake and onwards. This is not possible on AlderLake and
MeteorLake due to HW bug in PSR2 disable.
This patch is also fixing problems with cursor plane where cursor is
disappearing or duplicate cursor is seen on the screen.
v2: Commit message updated
Bspec: 68927, 68934, 66624
Reported-by: Janna Martl <janna.martl109@gmail.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/5522
Fixes: 411ad63877 ("drm/i915/psr: Use SFF_CTL on invalidate/flush for LunarLake onwards")
Tested-by: Janna Martl <janna.martl109@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250801062905.564453-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Since commit 0b30d57aca ("drm/debugfs: rework debugfs directory
creation v5") we should be using drm->debugfs_root instead of
minor->debugfs_root for creating debugfs files.
As a rule of thumb, use a local variable when there are two or more
uses, otherwise just have the single reference inline.
Drop drm/drm_file.h include where possible.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e8268546ec2a2941a3dc43c2fdc60f678dc03fce.1753782998.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Add new module parameter enable_panel_replay. This can be used to
enable/disable Panel Replay. 0=disabled, 1=enabled. -1=use per-chip default
(default).
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250715105509.4146806-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Current approach is that Early Transport is disabled in case enable_psr
module parameter is set. Let's ignore enable_psr parameter when choosing if
Early Transport can be used.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250715105509.4146806-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
With the switch to an unordered workqueue dedicated to display, we've
stopped using struct drm_i915_private in a number of places, and can
drop the dependencies on i915_drv.h.
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250626101636.1896365-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
When the panic handler is called, configure the psr to send the full
framebuffer to the monitor, otherwise the panic screen is only
partially visible.
Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Falempe <jfalempe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250624091501.257661-12-jfalempe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev@lankhorst.se>
Create a new unordered workqueue to be used by the display code
instead of relying on the i915 one. Then move all the unordered works
used in the display code to use this new queue.
Since this is an unordered workqueue, by definition there can't be any
order dependency with non-display works, so no extra care is needed
in regard to that.
This is part of the effort to isolate the display code from i915.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250620091632.1256135-1-luciano.coelho@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
This is a scripted split of the display related register macros from
i915_reg.h to display/intel_display_regs.h. As a starting point, move
all the macros that are only used in display code (or GVT). If there are
users in core i915 code or soc/, or no users anywhere, keep the macros
in i915_reg.h. This is done in groups of macros separated by blank
lines, moving the comments along with the groups.
Some manually picked macro groups are kept/moved regardless of the
heuristics above.
This is obviously a very crude approach. It's not perfect. But there are
4.2k lines in i915_reg.h, and its refactoring has ground to a halt. This
is the big hammer that splits the file to two, and enables further
cleanup.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> # v2
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250606102256.2080073-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Currently we spread ugly PSR details into ALPM code to check if AUXLess
ALPM is needed. Prepare to hide these details to PSR code by adding new
interface for checking if AUXLess ALPM is needed.
v2: remove kerneldoc comment
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250526120512.1702815-7-jouni.hogander@intel.com
There are several Panel Replay capability register in DPCD. Read them
all for later use.
v2:
- avoid using hardcoded indices
- read all Panel Replay capability registers
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250526120512.1702815-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Bspec comment on PSR2_SU_STATUS:
"This register has been tied-off since DG2/ADL-P (it returns zeros only)
and it has been removed on Xe2_LPD."
v2: fix inversed logic
Bspec: 69889
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250516063019.2126702-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently we are seeing these on PTL:
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Timeout waiting for DDI BUF A to get active
These seem to be caused by writing ALPM registers while Panel Replay is
enabled.
Fix this by writing ALPM registers only when Panel Replay is about to be
enabled.
v4: improve comment on intel_psr_panel_replay_enable_sink call
v3: enable/disable ALPM from PSR code
Fixes: 172757acd6 ("drm/i915/lobf: Add lobf enablement in post plane update")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250513054814.3702977-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
To deterministically capture the transition of the state machine going from
SRDOFFACK to IDLE, the delayed V. Blank should be at least one line after
the non-delayed V. Blank.
Ensure this by adding new interface into intel_psr to query number of lines
needed for vblank delay and call it from intel_crtc_vblank_delay.
v3: use existing intel_crtc_vblank_delay mechanism
v2: apply limits only when needed (VRR TG vs. Legacy TG)
Bspec: 69897
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250423102704.1368310-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Make a generic alpm enable function for sink which can be used for
PSR2/PR/Lobf.
v1: Initial version.
v2: Move code comment to intel_psr_needs_alpm(). [Jouni]
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250423092334.2294483-12-animesh.manna@intel.com
Currently clearing of alpm registers is done through psr_disable()
which is always not correct, without psr also alpm can exist. So
dis-integrate alpm_disable() from psr_disable().
v1: Initial version.
v2:
- Remove h/w register read from alpm_disable(). [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250423092334.2294483-5-animesh.manna@intel.com
Enablement of LOBF is added in post plane update whenever
has_lobf flag is set. As LOBF can be enabled in non-psr
case as well so adding in post plane update. There is no
change of configuring alpm with psr path.
v1: Initial version.
v2: Use encoder-mask to find the associated encoder from
crtc-state. [Jani]
v3: Remove alpm_configure from intel_psr.c. [Jouni]
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250423092334.2294483-3-animesh.manna@intel.com
Scope of intel_psr_needs_block_dc_vblank has changed now. Rename it as
intel_psr_needs_vblank_notification. Also rename
intel_crtc::block_dc_for_vblank as intel_crtc:vblank_psr_notify
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250414100508.1208774-13-jouni.hogander@intel.com
This patch is applying workaround for underrun on idle PSR HW issue
(Wa_16025596647) when PSR is getting enabled. It uses vblank enable/disable
status, DC5/6 enabled disabled and enabled pipes count information made
available.
This patch is also adding calls to dc5/dc6, vblank enable/disable and pipe
enable/disable notification functions as needed.
intel_psr_needs_block_dc_vblank is modified to get vblank enable/disable
notification on PSR capable system.
v2: use intel_dmc interface instead of directly writing dmc register
Bspec: 74151
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250414100508.1208774-12-jouni.hogander@intel.com
To implement Wa_16025596647 we need to get notification of vblank interrupt
enable/disable. Add new interface to PSR code for this notification.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250414100508.1208774-10-jouni.hogander@intel.com
We need to apply/remove workaround for underrun on idle PSR HW issue
(Wa_16025596647) when DC5/6 is enabled/disabled. This patch implements
mechanism to notify PSR about DC5/6 enable/disable and applies/removes the
workaround using this notification.
Bspec: 74115
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250414100508.1208774-9-jouni.hogander@intel.com
We need to apply/remove workaround for underrun on idle PSR HW issue
(Wa_16025596647) when new pipe is enabled or pipe is getting disabled. This
patch implements mechanism to notify PSR about pipe enable/disable and
applies/removes the workaround using this notification.
Bspec: 74151
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250414100508.1208774-8-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Block PKG C-State when enabling PSR when enabling PSR as described in
workaround for underrun on idle PSR HW issue (Wa_16025596647).
v2: use intel_dmc_block_pkgc instead of directly writing dmc register
Bspec: 74151
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250414100508.1208774-7-jouni.hogander@intel.com
To implement workaround for underrun on idle PSR HW issue (Wa_16025596647)
we need to know enabled. Figure out which non-PSR pipes we will have active
and store it into intel_crtc_state->active_non_psr_pipes. This is currently
assuming only one eDP on a time. I.e. possible secondary eDP with PSR
capable panel is not considered.
Bspec: 74151
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250414100508.1208774-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
We are seeing timeouts in opening CRC fd when testing on setup where DP
Panel Replay can be enabled. Fix these by checking if CRC is enabled for DP
Panel Replay as well.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250331090747.2964028-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
We have now seen this:
<4> [2120.434153] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] drm_WARN_ON(psr->paused)
<4> [2120.434196] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4430 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c:2227 intel_psr_pause+0x16e/0x180 [i915]
Comment for drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, psr->paused) in intel_psr_pause says:
"If we ever hit this, we will need to add refcount to pause/resume"
This patch is implementing PSR pause/resume refcount.
v3: Incorporate changes missing from v2
v2: Add drm_warn for detecting possible unbalanced pause/resume
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250328080623.1183669-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently intel_psr_disable is dumping out warning if PSR is not
supported. On monitor supporting only Panel Replay we are seeing this
warning. Fix this by checking Panel Replay support as well.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250213111628.2183753-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Allow writing PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL using DSB by using intel_de_write_dsb. Do
not check intel_dp->psr.lock being held when using DSB. This assertion
doesn't make sense as in case of using DSB the actual write happens later
and we are not taking intel_dp->psr.lock mutex over dsb commit.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250213064804.2077127-7-jouni.hogander@intel.com
In LunarLake we have SFF_CTL register which contains SFF bit ored with
respective SFF bit in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL register. Use this register instead
of the bit in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL on frontbuffer tracking callbacks. This
helps us avoiding taking psr mutex when performing atomic commit.
We don't need to set the CFF bit as selective update configuration in
PSR2_MAN_TRL_CTL is not overwritten anymore. I.e. we have valid
configuration in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL and in plane SEL_FETCH_* registers when
SFF bit gets cleared by the HW in case something triggers "frame change"
event after SFF bit is cleared.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250213064804.2077127-6-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Jouni Högander