This driver never used the older SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() but instead just
set two of the callbacks directly. Skip that deprecated macro and go
straight to the new form that avoids the need for guarding or marking
callbacks __maybe_unused.
--
It is possible there is some subtle reason why only two of the
callbacks normally set by SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() are set. As such,
this one needs some closer reading than many of the others.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-70-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-69-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-68-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-67-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-66-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-65-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-64-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Dario Binacchi <dariobin@libero.it>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-63-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Stephen Just <stephenjust@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-62-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-61-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-60-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-59-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-58-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Vincent Knecht <vincent.knecht@mailoo.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-57-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-56-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-55-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Sangwon Jee <jeesw@melfas.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-54-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-53-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-52-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-51-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-50-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Joe Hung <joe_hung@ilitek.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-49-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Anthony Kim <anthony.kim@hideep.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-48-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-47-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-46-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-45-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-44-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-43-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-42-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-41-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-40-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-39-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the #ifdef guards.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-38-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu5@cn.bosch.com>
Cc: Mark Jonas <mark.jonas@de.bosch.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-37-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-36-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-35-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-34-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-33-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-32-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Acked-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102181842.718010-31-jic23@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The elan touchscreen datasheet says that the reset GPIO only needs to
be asserted for 500us in order to reset the regulator. The problem is
that some boards need a level shifter between the signals on the GPIO
controller and the signals on the touchscreen. All of these extra
components on the line can slow the transition of the signals. On one
board, we measured the reset line and saw that it took almost 1.8ms to
go low. Even after we bumped up the "drive strength" of the signal
from the default 2mA to 8mA we still saw it take 421us for the signal
to go low.
In order to account for this let's lengthen the amount of time that we
keep the reset asserted. Let's bump it up from 500us to 5000us.
That's still a relatively short amount of time and is much safer.
It should be noted that this fixes real problems. Case in point:
1. The touchscreen power rail may be shared with another device (like
an eDP panel). That means that at probe time power might already be
on.
2. In probe we grab the reset GPIO and assert it (make it low).
3. We turn on power (a noop since it was already on).
4. We wait 500us.
5. We deassert the reset GPIO.
With the above case and only a 500us delay we saw only a partial reset
asserted, which is bad. Giving it 5ms is overkill but feels safer in
case someone else has a different level shifter setup.
Note that bumping up the delay to 5000 means that some configs yell
about using udelay(). We'll change to using usleep_range(). We give a
small range here because:
- This isn't a delay that happens very often so we don't need to worry
about giving a big range to allow for power efficiency.
- usleep_range() is known to almost always pick the upper bound and
delay that long and we really don't want to slow down the power on
of the touchscreen that much.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221208180603.v2.5.I6edfb3f459662c041563a54e5b7df727c27caaba@changeid
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-268-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-267-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-266-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-265-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-264-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-263-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-262-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-261-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-260-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-259-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-258-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-257-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-256-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-255-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-254-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-253-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-252-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-251-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-250-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-249-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-248-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-247-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-246-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-245-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-244-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-243-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-242-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-241-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-240-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-239-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Oliver Graute <oliver.graute@kococonnector.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-238-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-237-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-236-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-235-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-234-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-233-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-232-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-231-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-230-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-229-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-228-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-227-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118224540.619276-226-uwe@kleine-koenig.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The linux,keycodes property is optional.
Fix the driver not probing when it's not specified.
Fixes: c18ef50346 ("Input: msg2638 - add support for msg2138 key events")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Knecht <vincent.knecht@mailoo.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221130210202.2069213-1-vincent.knecht@mailoo.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
We shuffled the error handling around so this condition is dead code
now. The "error" variable is always zero.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y33BD9xkRC9euIdO@kili
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Since commit 0166dc11be ("of: make CONFIG_OF user selectable"), it
is possible to test-build any driver which depends on OF on any
architecture by explicitly selecting OF. Therefore depending on
COMPILE_TEST as an alternative is no longer needed.
It is actually better to always build such drivers with OF enabled,
so that the test builds are closer to how each driver will actually be
built on its intended target. Building them without OF may not test
much as the compiler will optimize out potentially large parts of the
code. In the worst case, this could even pop false positive warnings.
Dropping COMPILE_TEST here improves the quality of our testing and
avoids wasting time on non-existent issues.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221121145203.1efb0c08@endymion.delvare
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The raydium I2C touchscreen driver is currently manually managing the
wake IRQ. This change removes the explicit enable_irq_wake /
disable_irq_wake and instead relies on the PM subsystem. This is done by
calling dev_pm_set_wake_irq.
i2c_device_probe already calls dev_pm_set_wake_irq when using device
tree, and i2c_device_remove also already calls dev_pm_clear_wake_irq.
There could be some device tree systems that have incorrectly declared
`wake` capabilities, so this change will set the wake irq if one is
missing. This matches the previous behavior.
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220929093200.v6.4.I06b417b274bbecb31775a73993a7a3c1bc80de7b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The Elan I2C touchscreen driver is currently manually managing the wake
IRQ. This change removes the explicit enable_irq_wake/disable_irq_wake
and instead relies on the PM subsystem. This is done by calling
dev_pm_set_wake_irq.
i2c_device_probe already calls dev_pm_set_wake_irq when using device
tree, and i2c_device_remove also already calls dev_pm_clear_wake_irq.
There could be some device tree systems that have incorrectly declared
`wake` capabilities, so this change will set the wake irq if one is
missing. This matches the previous behavior.
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220929093200.v6.3.I5862429ee3e4de0f9ad5ba01ce07ad99eec10cf0@changeid
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
As can be seen in elants_i2c_power_off(), we want the reset GPIO
asserted when power is off. The reset GPIO is active low so we need
the reset line logic low when power is off to avoid leakage.
We have a problem, though, at probe time. At probe time we haven't
powered the regulators on yet but we have:
devm_gpiod_get(&client->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
While that _looks_ right, it turns out that it's not. The
GPIOD_OUT_LOW doesn't mean to init the GPIO to low. It means init the
GPIO to "not asserted". Since this is an active low GPIO that inits it
to be high.
Let's fix this to properly init the GPIO. Now after both probe and
power off the state of the GPIO is consistent (it's "asserted" or
level low).
Once we fix this, we can see that at power on time we no longer to
assert the reset GPIO as the first thing. The reset GPIO is _always_
asserted before powering on. Let's fix powering on to account for
this.
Fixes: afe10358e4 ("Input: elants_i2c - wire up regulator support")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117123805.1.I9959ac561dd6e1e8e1ce7085e4de6167b27c574f@changeid
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
In the very unlikely event the cst3xx_i2c_write() fails inside of the
cst3xx_bootloader_enter() function 5 times in a row, the uninitalized
value of tmp will get compared to CST3XX_BOOTLDR_CHK_VAL. Initialize
the value of tmp to 0 so that in this unlikely event we are comparing
0 instead of an uninitalized variable.
Fixes: 66603243f5 ("Input: add driver for Hynitron cstxxx touchscreens")
Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117195921.2291-1-macroalpha82@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
msg2138 only supports 2 fingers presses, and needs different processing
since second finger press is encoded as a delta position wrt. first one
and the packet/touch_event structs are not the same as msg2638.
Add support for it by implementing distinct structs and irq handler.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Knecht <vincent.knecht@mailoo.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221110171952.34207-4-vincent.knecht@mailoo.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
This patch adds support for Himax hx83112b touchscreen devices. As there
are no publicly available data sheets for these devices, the
implementation is based on the driver of the downstream Android kernel
used in the Fairphone 3. This patch is a complete rewrite, though, and
the code bears no resemblence to the original implementation.
The driver has been tested on the aforementioned phone.
Signed-off-by: Job Noorman <job@noorman.info>
Reviewed-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221107105604.26541-3-job@noorman.info
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
On ACPI systems (irq_pin_access_method == IRQ_PIN_ACCESS_ACPI_*) the driver
does not reset the controller at probe time, because sometimes the system
firmware loads a config and resetting might loose this config.
On the Nanote UMPC-01 device OTOH the config is in flash of the controller,
the controller needs a reset to load this; and the system firmware does not
reset the controller on a cold boot.
To fix the Nanote UMPC-01 touchscreen not working on a cold boot, try
resetting the controller and then re-reading the config when encountering
a config with 0 width/height/max_touch_num value and the controller has
not already been reset by goodix_ts_probe().
This should be safe to do in general because normally we should never
encounter a config with 0 width/height/max_touch_num. Doing this in
general not only avoids the need for a DMI quirk, but also might help
other systems.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025122930.421377-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Jonathan Cameron