While writing an application that requires user stack trace option
to work in instances, I found that the instance option has a bug
that makes it a nop. The check for performing the user stack trace
in an instance, checks the top level options (not the instance options)
to determine if a user stack trace should be performed or not.
This is not only incorrect, but also confusing for users. It confused
me for a bit!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iIoEABYIADIWIQRRSw7ePDh/lE+zeZMp5XQQmuv6qgUCX85BzBQccm9zdGVkdEBn
b29kbWlzLm9yZwAKCRAp5XQQmuv6qv7XAQCzfq6DpHUv1gVaBkGytOszLW4IuEtd
/09jDPbVSG8T2QEA+e6fpBP1aIixgLN6+vFVl3wAK3SaIQeIA/blkbBNFQ0=
=o1Ew
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'trace-v5.10-rc7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace
Pull tracing fix from Steven Rostedt:
"Fix userstacktrace option for instances
While writing an application that requires user stack trace option to
work in instances, I found that the instance option has a bug that
makes it a nop. The check for performing the user stack trace in an
instance, checks the top level options (not the instance options) to
determine if a user stack trace should be performed or not.
This is not only incorrect, but also confusing for users. It confused
me for a bit!"
* tag 'trace-v5.10-rc7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace:
tracing: Fix userstacktrace option for instances
cd796ed334