One of Jakub's tests[1] shows that there may be period all ports
are down and no active slave. This makes the new_active_slave null
and the test fails. Add a check to make sure the new active is not null.
[ 189.051966] br0: port 2(s1) entered disabled state
[ 189.317881] bond0: (slave eth1): link status definitely down, disabling slave
[ 189.318487] bond0: (slave eth2): making interface the new active one
[ 190.435430] br0: port 4(s2) entered disabled state
[ 190.773786] bond0: (slave eth0): link status definitely down, disabling slave
[ 190.774204] bond0: (slave eth2): link status definitely down, disabling slave
[ 190.774715] bond0: now running without any active interface!
[ 190.877760] bond0: (slave eth0): link status definitely up
[ 190.878098] bond0: (slave eth0): making interface the new active one
[ 190.878495] bond0: active interface up!
[ 191.802872] br0: port 4(s2) entered blocking state
[ 191.803157] br0: port 4(s2) entered forwarding state
[ 191.813756] bond0: (slave eth2): link status definitely up
[ 192.847095] br0: port 2(s1) entered blocking state
[ 192.847396] br0: port 2(s1) entered forwarding state
[ 192.853740] bond0: (slave eth1): link status definitely up
# TEST: prio (active-backup ns_ip6_target primary_reselect 1) [FAIL]
# Current active slave is null but not eth0
[1] https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-bonding/results/464481/1-bond-options-sh/stdout
Fixes: 45bf79bc56 ("selftests: bonding: reduce garp_test/arp_validate test time")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
31f26e4fec