The cgrp_ancestor_storage has two drawbacks:
- it's not guaranteed that the member immediately follows struct cgrp in
cgroup_root (root cgroup's ancestors[0] might thus point to a padding
and not in cgrp_ancestor_storage proper),
- this idiom raises warnings with -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end.
Instead of relying on the auxiliary member in cgroup_root, define the
0-th level ancestor inside struct cgroup (needed for static allocation
of cgrp_dfl_root), deeper cgroups would allocate flexible
_low_ancestors[]. Unionized alias through ancestors[] will
transparently join the two ranges.
The above change would still leave the flexible array at the end of
struct cgroup inside cgroup_root, so move cgrp also towards the end of
cgroup_root to resolve the -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5fb74444-2fbb-476e-b1bf-3f3e279d0ced@embeddedor.com/
Reported-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b3eb050d-9451-4b60-b06c-ace7dab57497@embeddedor.com/
Cc: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
ef56578274