This makes `--system` imply `-Doptimize=ReleaseFast` and
`-Dcpu=baseline`. These can still be overridden by the user by setting
the same flags explicitly.
The `--system` flag is used to build system packages and its a safe
assumption that in those cases, Ghostty is being built for general use
amongst many users, so the default should be optimized for
performance and compatibility.
This was always documented in our PACKAGING.md, but is now automatic.
The PACKAGING.md file has been updated to reflect this.
This PR adds a new configuration option
`macos-dock-drop-folder-behavior` that controls whether folders dropped
onto the Ghostty dock icon open in a new tab (default) or a new window.
## Changes
### Configuration Option Added
- **Option name**: `macos-dock-drop-folder-behavior`
- **Valid values**:
- `tab` (default) - Opens folders in a new tab in the main window
- `window` - Opens folders in a new window
- **Platform**: macOS only
### Files Modified
1. **`src/config/Config.zig`**
- Added `MacOSDockDropFolderBehavior` enum with `tab` and `window`
values
- Added configuration field with default value of `.tab`
- Added documentation explaining the option
2. **`macos/Sources/Ghostty/Package.swift`**
- Added `MacOSDockDropFolderBehavior` enum to match the Zig enum
3. **`macos/Sources/Ghostty/Ghostty.Config.swift`**
- Added `macosDockDropFolderBehavior` computed property to access the
configuration value from Swift
4. **`macos/Sources/App/macOS/AppDelegate.swift`**
- Modified `application(_:openFile:)` method to check the configuration
- When a folder is dropped on the dock icon, it now respects the user's
preference
## Usage
Add to your Ghostty configuration file:
```
macos-dock-drop-folder-behavior = window
```
## Motivation
This feature is useful for users (like me!) who prefer window-based
workflows over tab-based workflows when opening folders via drag and
drop on macOS.
This adds a new configuration option that controls whether folders
dropped onto the Ghostty dock icon open in a new tab (default) or
a new window.
The option accepts two values:
- tab: Opens folders in a new tab in the main window (default)
- window: Opens folders in a new window
This is useful for users who prefer window-based workflows over
tab-based workflows when opening folders via drag and drop.
This PR aims to improve custom icons on macOS in the following ways. (I
based this PR on the discussion #3631)
### Currently
- Current Icon customizations are not persistent *(when closing the
application the icon in dock reverts back to official icon)*
- There is no officially supported way to change icon to be something
completely custom.
### After this PR
- Current icon customizations are persistent (closing the application no
longer reverts back to official icon)
- Ghostty config `macos-icon` has a new option `custom` which by default
looks for icon `~/.config/ghostty/Ghostty.icns`. It has an accompanying
new configuration `macos-custom-icon` which allows for a different path
to be specified, it does support more than just `.icns` as well.
Both changes are based on the thread with @sfsam in
https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/discussions/3631#discussioncomment-12180647
Feedback is always welcome, if I have not done something up to par
please let me know and I will do my best to correct it.
NOTE: I did notice some newlines with indents which seems to be against
convention in those files so I removed the whitespace if this is not
preferred I can revert.
---
P.S. Thanks for all the work you put into making an awesome terminal!
This switches our macOS builds to build on Tahoe, rather than on
Sequoia.
The primary motivation is to get builds out using a new Xcode version
(our builds at the time of writing this are _still produced_ with beta
1! ONE!). Every subsequent beta has had bugs that have prevented us from
upgrading, amusingly enough. But the later betas _also_ have a bunch of
fixes I want to get in. I hope this one works...
The reason we have to use Tahoe instead of Sequoia is because on
Sequoia, builds in CI _crash xcodebuild_. This is definitely an Apple
bug but I can't reproduce it locally to create a bug report, so I'm not
sure what to do.
The SDK published on Flathub updated to Zig 0.15.1 which broke the
Flathub build in CI. So let's install it ourselves so that we can
control the version.
This contains the various changes necessary to get the full unit test
suite passing Valgrind, and configures CI to run this.
I disabled relatively few (less than 10) tests under Valgrind because
they're way too slow: all `verifyIntegrity` tests, because those run
anyways in debug and check their own memory health, a font test that
fills out font map, and the sprite render test. Everything else runs
as-is.
I found a number of issues, most were in the tests themselves. A couple
in actual code. A funny one was some undefined memory on tabstop resize
if you exceed the default number of tabstops. I don't know any real
world program that ever even did that (memory issue aside), and that
whole file hasn't been touched since 2022, so that was funny.
No memory leaks in actual code, but a number of leaks in tests. All
resolved.
I think we're still missing some reports because of the Zig bug:
https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/19148 so I'm gong to audit our
codebase after this and look for cases of that.
When constraints increased or decreased the size significantly, the
fractional position was getting messed up by the scale. This change
separates that out so that it applies correctly.
I noticed this when messing around with constraints, adding this
constraint to every glyph and then running with `font-family=Arial` and
`adjust-cell-width = -35%` (if you want to reproduce this)
```zig
constraint = .{
.size_horizontal = .stretch,
.align_horizontal = .center,
.pad_left = 0.1,
.pad_right = 0.1,
};
```
The padding was disproportionately affecting thin glyphs that were
stretched a lot. The problem was that the padding was being multiplied
by the scale.
This also made it so the top or right of said thin glyphs often got
clipped off by the edge of the canvas.
Anyway I fixed it.
|Before|After|
|-|-|
|<img width="1824" height="1480" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/32779f9d-a048-4a8c-b5ea-0e8a851d5119"
/>|<img width="1824" height="1480" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5bf449e5-699e-4bdc-ac96-2b776f9fb7fa"
/>|
The SDK published on Flathub updated to Zig 0.15.1 which broke the
Flathub build in CI. So let's install it ourselves so that we can
control the version.
When constraints increased or decreased the size significantly, the
fractional position was getting messed up by the scale. This change
separates that out so that it applies correctly.
This runs Valgrind on our unit test suite in CI. Since we're not
currently passing Valgrind, this will be incrementally updated with the
filters for our passing tests. Ultimately, we'll remove the filters and
run the full suite.
Valgrind is slow and hungry so this is our first and only job currently
on a large instance.
This runs Valgrind on our unit test suite in CI. Since we're not
currently passing Valgrind, this will be incrementally updated with the
filters for our passing tests. Ultimately, we'll remove the filters and
run the full suite.
Valgrind is slow and hungry so this is our first and only job currently
on a large instance.
This works around: https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/19148 This lets
our `test-valgrind` command catch some issues. We'll have to follow this
pattern in more places but I want to do it incrementally so things keep
passing.
I **do not** want to blindly follow this pattern everywhere. I want to
start by focusing in only on the structs that set `undefined` as default
fields that we're also about to test in isolation with Valgrind. It's
just too much noise otherwise and not a general style I'm sure of; it's
worth it for Valgrind though.
I'm making this PR separate from any fixes because the diff is so noisy
I don't want to lose the fixes in the noise. **This PR is therefore
functionally a no-op.**
This works around: https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/19148
This lets our `test-valgrind` command catch some issues. We'll have to
follow this pattern in more places but I want to do it incrementally so
things keep passing.
I **do not** want to blindly follow this pattern everywhere. I want to
start by focusing in only on the structs that set `undefined` as default
fields that we're also about to test in isolation with Valgrind. Its
just too much noise otherwise and not a general style I'm sure of; it's
worth it for Valgrind though.
This adds two explicit `zig build` steps: `run-valgrind` and
`test-valgrind` to run the Ghostty exe or tests under Valgrind,
respectively.
This simplifies the manual Valgrind calls in a few ways:
1. It automatically sets the CPU to baseline, which is a frequent and
requirement for Valgrind on newer CPUs, and generally safe.
2. It sets up the rather complicated set of flags to call Valgrind with,
importantly setting up our suppressions.
3. It enables pairing it with the typical and comfortable workflow of
specifying extra args (with `--`) or flags like `-Dtest-filter` for
tests.
This adds two explicit `zig build` steps: `run-valgrind` and
`test-valgrind` to run the Ghostty exe or tests under Valgrind,
respectively.
This simplifies the manual Valgrind calls in a few ways:
1. It automatically sets the CPU to baseline, which is a frequent and
requirement for Valgrind on newer CPUs, and generally safe.
2. It sets up the rather complicated set of flags to call Valgrind with,
importantly setting up our suppressions.
3. It enables pairing it with the typical and comfortable workflow of
specifying extra args (with `--`) or flags like `-Dtest-filter` for
tests.
Mitchell Hashimoto